MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6899078097 · doi:10.58079/d10

Le mot, le rythme et l’image

2008· other· fr· W6899078097 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2008
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)Power (physics)Work (physics)Order (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après le succès de ses six premiers colloques estudiantins (2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008), le département de français de l’Université de Victoria organise une septième rencontre pour les 13 et 14 mars 2009. Dans le cadre de ce colloque, nous nous proposons d’examiner la problématique suivante : le mot, le rythme et l’image. Nous sollicitons des communications adoptant des approches diverses et traitant des littératures et cinémas du Québec, du Canada, de la France, de l'Afrique, des Caraïbes et des autres régions de la francophonie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.035
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1770.321

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)French-language works237,207