MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6899203349 · doi:10.58079/rk7y

Séminaire - Études sur les femmes/Women's Studies

2022· article· fr· W6899203349 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Identification (biology)Set (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La prochaine session du séminaire virtuel international de la FISIER ReNoV/ReNeW "Études sur les femmes" aura lieu le vendredi 4 février 2022 de 16h à 19h. Les deux intervenantes sont Michèle Clément (Université Lyon 2, France) et Hélène Cazes (University of Victoria, Canada). MICHÈLE CLÉMENT (Université Lyon 2, France)Étude sur les femmes et nouvelles voies de la recherche sur la RenaissanceÉtudes sur les femmes, études féministes, études sur le masculin, études du genre, études queer… les ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesFrench-language works237,207