MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6899208791 · doi:10.58079/luzw

Active Voices ... wir reden mit Leslie Chan über Transdisziplinarität und Partizipation

2022· article· de· W6899208791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociology and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Action (physics)Subject (documents)Order (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Im November sprachen wir mit Leslie Chan über das Jahresthema des Berliner Antike-Kollegs. „Mit!Reden. Transdisziplinarität und Partizipation in den Altertumswissenschaften.“ Das Gespräch führte Dr. Sabine Müller für das Berliner Antike-Kolleg. Leslie Chan kurz vorgestellt: Leslie Chan ist Professor am Department of Global Development Studies und Direktor des transdisziplinären Knowledge Equity Lab an der Universität Toronto Scarborough. Leslie Chan ist Internet-Pionier und hat das World-Wid...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.009
Scholarly communication0.0110.015
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)Same topicSociology and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207