MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6899227605 · doi:10.58079/15pl

Définition du génie dans les discours savants et théoriques

2020· other· fr· W6899227605 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2020
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryHistory of scienceSubject (documents)Science history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le laboratoire junior FIGéE 17-18 (Lyon, Saint-Etienne, Montréal) organise le 10 février 2021 en visioconférence sa première journée d'études, « Définition du génie dans les discours savants et théoriques », conformément au premier axe de recherche de son projet. La vocation de cette journée interdisciplinaire est d'accueillir les contributions de chercheurs issus de disciplines telles que : littératures françaises et comparées ; histoire de la langue française ; littératures européennes non francophones : néo-latine, britannique, hispanique, italienne, portugaise, germanique... ; philosophie ; histoire ; histoire des sciences et des techniques...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1190.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207