MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Concentrations, fluxes and isotopic signatures of greenhouse gases emitted from lakes and ponds on Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada

2023· dataset· en· W6899285508 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNordicana D · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCenter for Northern StudiesUniversité de SherbrookeInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasFlux (metallurgy)Radiocarbon datingStable isotope ratioArcticThermokarstCarbon fluxRange (aeronautics)Isotope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic lakes and ponds can be hot spots for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, yet studies are scarce, particularly outside the peak summer season. Here we present GHG diffusive and ebullition flux data collected over a decade from a range of water bodies formed on an organic-rich, polygonal landscape originating from syngenetic permafrost. The GHG concentrations and flux data are supplemented with radiocarbon and stable isotope signatures of the emitted gases, together with limnological properties of the studied lakes and ponds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNordicana DFrench-language works237,207