MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6901374320 · doi:10.60692/0fp0c-92j17

DETECTION OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS IN A DAIRY FARM IN BENI-SUEF CITY, EGYPT

2018· article· en· W6901374320 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMastitisCalifornia mastitis testSomatic cell countSubclinical infectionQuarter (Canadian coin)Staphylococcus aureusDairy cattle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A total of 116 quarter milk samples were collected aseptically from apparently healthy udders of 29 cows in a dairy farm in Beni-Suef city, Egypt; for detection of subclinical mastitis using California mastitis test (CMT), somatic cell count (SCC), chemical and microbiological examination. Thirteen cows (44.83%) were subclinically mastitic with 27 mastitic quarters (23.28%).The scores of CMT showed 11 quarters (40.74%) as +1 and 16 quarters (59.26%) as +2. The SCC of fore left (FL) quarter milk samples was 4.3×105±1.2×105, while of fore right (FR) quarter milk samples was 3.8×105 ±1.1×105, but for SCC of hind left (HL) quarter milk samples was 2.4×105±9.5×104 and SCC of hind right (HR) quarter milk samples was 2.2×105±7.9×104. The isolated micro-organisms from the examined milk samples were Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CNS), Streptococcus spp , E.coli and Aspergillus fumigatus. The present study assured that the indirect tests of subclinical mastitis are more suitable for selecting cows with intramammary infections for subsequent bacteriological sampling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information SystemSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207