MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6901564557 · doi:10.6068/dp15b017bdedb55

Trend. Xignite. FactSet Corporate Fundamentals: Average Daily Volume Last 6 Months | Country: USA | Stock Symbol: NDAQ | Symbol Name: Nasdaq Inc | Exchange: NASDAQ Stock Exchange, 01/04/2010-03/23/2017. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 016-005-035.

2017· other· en· W6901564557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStock exchangeStock (firearms)Stock marketStatisticStock market indexEarnings

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xignite (2017). FactSet Corporate Fundamentals: Average Daily Volume Last 6 Months | Country: USA | Stock Symbol: NDAQ | Symbol Name: Nasdaq Inc | Exchange: NASDAQ Stock Exchange, . Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. [Data-file]. Dataset-ID: 016-005-035. Dataset: Shows average daily volume for the previous six months. The statistic is calculated by dividing total volume for the previous six months by the actual number of trade days of the previous six months. This database provides stock fundamentals data for active United States and Canadian listed companies. Companies are identified by symbol and name. Equities, common stock, and some ETFs and preferred stocks are covered. Exchanges include BATS, NASDAQ, NYSE ARCA, NYSE Market Equities, and limited OTCBB and TSX Venture coverage (liquid companies only). Data points include earnings and dividends, ratios and sales, and stock price. Note that not all metrics are available for all stocks. Data-Planet distributes the data, produced by FactSet (www.factset.com), via license from Xignite. FactSet was founded in 1978 and has been publicly held since 1996. The Company is dual listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “FDS.” Category: Industry, Business, and Commerce, Banking, Finance, and Insurance Source: Xignite Xignite provides on-demand financial market data covering global equities, commodities, currencies, options, fixed income, mutual funds, derivatives, and OTC (“over-the-counter” or those traded in a context other than a formal exchange) instruments. http://www.xignite.com/ Subject: Stock Indexes, Corporations, Stock Markets, Financials, Publicly Traded Companies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.219

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData PlanetFrench-language works237,207