Deep learning predictions of unsteady aerodynamic loads on an airfoil model pitched over the entire operating range
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the design and certification of wind turbines, it is essential to provide fast and accurate unsteady aerodynamic load prediction models for the whole operational range of angle of attack, up to 180° for vertical-axis and 90° for horizontal-axis wind turbines. This work describes a computationally efficient unsteady forces prediction model based on a deep learning approach, namely the bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) algorithm, for an airfoil pitched over the full operational range of angles of attack up to 180°. No model has been developed to capture the unsteady forces at high angles of attack. Novel features based on operating conditions and the steady polars of the airfoil are used as inputs for the BiLSTM model. Direct measurements of steady and unsteady forces on a NACA 0021 airfoil model were conducted at reduced frequencies up to 0.075 and a Reynolds number of 120 000 in an open-jet wind tunnel for model learning and testing. The unsteady forces vary significantly from the steady values at high pitching amplitudes and post-stall angles, which, if not accounted for when simulating wind turbine performance, would result in inaccurate predictions. Furthermore, measurements revealed the effect of unsteady vorticity development and shedding on aerodynamic forces under forward and reverse flow conditions. The BiLSTM model is capable of capturing the underlying physics of unsteady aerodynamic forces under extreme operating conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".