MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6901630618 · doi:10.6068/dp15dfd567e0920

Trend 1970 - 2014. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics: Prices - Deflators | Country: Canada | Item: Value Added Deflator in Agriculture, forestry and fishery | Element: Value US$, 2005 prices -, 1970-2014. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 067-001-063.

2017· other· en· W6901630618 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGDP deflatorNational accountsAgricultureValue (mathematics)Measures of national income and outputProduct (mathematics)Gross fixed capital formationGross domestic productNational Income and Product Accounts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017). Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics: Prices - Deflators | Country: Canada | Item: Value Added Deflator in Agriculture, forestry and fishery | Element: Value US$, 2005 prices -, 1970-2014. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. [Data-file]. Dataset-ID: 067-001-063. Dataset: Provides three implicit price deflator series by country: Gross Domestic Product (GDP) deflator, Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) deflator, and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery Value-Added (VA_AFF) deflator. A deflator is a figure expressing the change in prices over a period of time for a product or a basket of products by comparing a reference period to a base period. The deflators presented here are obtained by dividing the series in current prices by those in constant 2005 prices (base year). Movements in an implicit price deflator reflect both changes in price and changes in the composition of the aggregate for which the deflator is calculated. All series are derived from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates database. The time-series and cross-sectional data provided here are from the FAOSTAT database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistics include measures related to the food supply; forestry; agricultural production, prices, and investment; and trade and use of resources, such as fertilizers, land, and pesticides. As available, data are provided for approximately 245 countries and 35 regional areas from 1961 through the present. The data are typically supplied by governments to FAO Statistics through national publications and FAO questionnaires. Official data have sometimes been supplemented with data from unofficial sources and from other national or international agencies or organizations. In particular, for the European Union member countries, with the exception of Spain, data obtained from EUROSTAT have been used. Category: Agriculture and Food, International Relations and Trade Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Established in 1945 as a specialized agency of the United Nations, the Food and Agricultural Organization’s mandate is to raise levels of nutrition, improve agricultural productivity, better the lives of rural populations, and contribute to the growth of the world economy. Staff experts in seven FAO departments serve as a knowledge network to collect, analyze, and disseminate data, sharing policy expertise with member countries and implementing projects and programs throughout the world aimed at achieving rural development and hunger alleviation goals. The Statistics Division of the Food and Agricultural Organization collates and disseminates food and agricultural statistics globally. http://www.fao.org/ Subject: Prices, Agricultural Production, Agricultural Commodities, Agricultural Products

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.020
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.105

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Planet→French-language works237,207→