MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6901635646 · doi:10.6068/dp157ba442c8413

TREND: National Center for Education Statistics. National Postsecondary Student Aid Study: Financial Aid - First-Time Undergraduates | State: California | Educational Institution: Biola University | Indicator: Number of full-time first-time undergraduates receiving any financial aid, 2001 - 2013. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 017-016-006

2016· other· en· W6901635646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostsecondary educationStatistics educationGovernment (linguistics)Vocational educationHigher educationQuarter (Canadian coin)Student loanWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

National Center for Education Statistics. National Postsecondary Student Aid Study: Financial Aid - First-Time Undergraduates | State: California | Educational Institution: Biola University | Indicator: Number of full-time first-time undergraduates receiving any financial aid, 2001 - 2013. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 017-016-006 Dataset: Provides statistics on amount and sources of Title IV federal financial aid received by first-time undergraduate students attending US postsecondary institutions. Title IV aid to students includes grant aid, work study aid, and loan aid. Full-time, first-time degree-/certificate-seeking undergraduates are those enrolled in a 4- or 5-year bachelor's degree program, an associate's degree program, or a vocational or technical program below the baccalaureate level, who have no prior postsecondary experience, and are enrolled for 12 or more semester credits, or 12 or more quarter credits, or 24 or more contact hours a week each term. The National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) examines the characteristics of students in postsecondary education in the United States, with focus on how their education is financed. The purpose of NPSAS is to compile a comprehensive research dataset, based on student-level records, on financial aid provided by the federal government, the states, postsecondary institutions, employers, and private agencies, along with student demographic and enrollment data. NPSAS is the primary source of information used to inform public policy on such programs as the Pell grants and Stafford loans. NPSAS data come from multiple sources, including institutional records, government databases, and student interviews. Detailed data on participation in student financial aid programs are extracted from institutional records. Data about family circumstances, demographics, education and work experiences, and student expectations are collected from students through a web-based multi-mode interview (self-administered and computer-assisted telephone). http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/npsas/index.asp Category: Education Subject: Financial Support, Costs, Undergraduate Students, Federal Aid, Undergraduate Education Source: National Center for Education Statistics The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity in the United States for collecting and analyzing data related to education in the US and other nations. NCES is located within the US Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences. The NCES fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report complete statistics on the condition of US education; conduct and publish reports; and review and report on education activities internationally. The NCES is one of four centers (along with the National Center for Education Research, the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, and the National Center for Special Education Research) charged with carrying out the work of the Institute of Education Sciences. http://nces.ed.gov/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.021
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1010.075

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Planet→French-language works237,207→