MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6901694387 · doi:10.60692/4dx68-q4g36

IEEE Access Special Section Editorial: Lightweight Security and Provenance for Internet of Health Things

2021· article· en· W6901694387 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteroperabilityNetwork packetThe InternetSpecial sectionPacket lossInternet of Things

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an extension of the Internet of Things (IoT), the Internet of Health Things (IoHT) plays an important role in the remote exchange of data of different physical processes such as patient monitoring, treatment progress, observation, and consultation. In IoHT, connectivity, integration, computation, and interoperability are enabled through various sensors, actuators, and controllers, thereby providing seamless connectivity with efficient utilization of resources. With advances in telemedicine, telesurgery, and other healthcare applications, streaming has become an essential part of IoHT. The data traffic in IoHT applications, such as interactive multimedia streaming, real-time image processing, traffic generated from faulty sensors and vital signs, can tolerate packet loss but has stringent delay requirements. On the other hand, video streaming applications cannot tolerate jitter. Similarly, the low-power devices are sensitive to packet loss and the periodic physiological traffic of medical traffic can tolerate delay or jitter, but not packet loss. Routing data in different IoHT applications has varying quality-of-service (QoS) requirements in terms of delay, packet loss, jitter, and throughput.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0150.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information SystemSame topicHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringFrench-language works237,207