MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6901720336 · doi:10.60770/dajp-x149

Principles of creativity in the workplace

2024· book· en· W6901720336 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMRU-Repo · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCreativity in Education and Neuroscience
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreativityPosition (finance)Creativity techniquePosition paperData collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book is a living collection of thoughts, reflections, challenges, and resources passed on to Kris Hans in August 2020 by Rod Corbett. Rod collected his knowledge along with many others to help the reader gain a better understanding of the principles that can be applied to develop creativity in any workplace. This book is meant to serve as the primary textbook for MGMT 2275 — Creativity in the Workplace at Mount Royal University, and can be used by learners who are studying how they can develop their own creative abilities and support the development of others that they may be in a position to supervise, lead, and support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMRU-RepoSame topicCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceFrench-language works237,207