MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6901873351 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.11919105

La communication pédagogique dans une communauté d’apprenants en réseau : récit de pratique. Revue internationale de communication et de socialisation, 2(2), 123-136

2020· article· fr· W6901873351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInformation Technology and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Intervention (counseling)Occupational training

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En suivant la méthode du récit de pratique, une enseignante raconte la communication pédagogique qui a été établie dans une classe d’élèves québécois de 13-14 ans équipés d’ordinateurs portatifs branchés en réseau. L’orientation générale de la communication pédagogique développée par l’enseignante visait à installer et à maintenir une communauté d’apprenants susceptible de connaître des moments de coélaboration de connaissances. L’universitaire qui l’a accompagnée a été témoin de son intervention pédagogique et toutes deux ont entretenu un dialogue progressif sur cette même pratique ainsi que sur ses fondements théoriques. Le nouvel environnement d’apprentissage créé, tout comme les nouveaux rôles observés, constitue les résultats de cette recherche-action réalisée en collaboration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it