Additional file 1 of Alcohol and cannabis use during the COVID-19 pandemic among transgender, gender-diverse, and cisgender adults in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Table S1. Survey interviews information and response rate calculations. Table S2. Full estimation: Logistic and ordinal logistic regressions of heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use at least once a week, and change in alcohol and cannabis use on transgender and gender-diverse status with cisgender participants (both men and women) as reference group. Table S3. Full estimation: Logistic and ordinal logistic regressions of heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use at least once a week, and subjective change in alcohol and cannabis use on transgender and gender-diverse status with cisgender women as reference group. Table S4. Full estimation: Logistic and ordinal logistic regressions of heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use at least once a week, and subjective change in alcohol and cannabis use on transgender and gender-diverse status with cisgender men as reference group. Table S5. Sensitivity analysis: Logistic and ordinal logistic regressions of heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use at least once a week, and subjective change in alcohol and cannabis use on transgender or gender-diverse status with participants who did not answer the gender identity question. Table S6. Full estimation: Logistic and ordinal logistic regressions of heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use at least once a week, and subjective change in alcohol and cannabis use on transgender and gender-diverse status with cisgender participants (both men and women) as reference group. The six categories of age groups were used in this model. Table S7. Full estimation: Logistic and ordinal logistic regressions of heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use at least once a week, and subjective change in alcohol and cannabis use on transgender and gender-diverse status with cisgender women as reference group. The six categories of age groups were used in this model. Table S8. Full estimation: Logistic and ordinal logistic regressions of heavy episodic drinking, cannabis use at least once a week, and subjective change in alcohol and cannabis use on transgender and gender-diverse status with cisgender men as reference group. The six categories of age groups were used in this model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.426 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".