Additional file 1 of Paternal care effects outweigh gamete-mediated and personal environment effects during the transgenerational estimation of risk in fathead minnows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1. Section 1. Breeding, rearing and alarm cue exposure protocol. Section 2. Supporting results: Variation in parental care intensity. Section 3. Supporting results: Variation in the change in shoaling density. Section 4. Supporting discussion: Other factors affecting parental care intensity. Table S1. Full and final linear mixed-effect models analysing the factors explaining variation in Pimephales promelas parental care intensity, with risk treatment as the fixed effect of interest. Table S2. Full and final linear mixed-effect models analysing the factors explaining variation in average body size within shoals and within-shoal variation in body size, respectively. Table S3. Impact of average fish size within shoals and shoal heterogeneity on prestimulus shoaling density and the change in shoaling density when density is measured in a absolute distances, i.e., centimeters and b relative distances, i.e., # of body lengths. Fig. S1. Average (over a 10-min period) interindividual distances (mean ± SE) of 39-day old fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) before (prestimulus) and after (poststimulus) a mechanical predator disturbance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.849 | 0.140 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".