MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6902114487 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22612823

Additional file 1 of Systematic characterization of Brassica napus UBC13 genes involved in DNA-damage response and K63-linked polyubiquitination

2023· article· en· W6902114487 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyntenyGeneBrassicaBrassica rapaChromosomeArabidopsisGene familyGene duplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Table S1. The characteristics of identified Brassica napus UBC13 genes and gene products. Table S2. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Table S3. Primers used to amplify BnUBC13 genes. Fig. S1. A flowchart outlining experimental designs of this study. Fig. S2. Synteny analysis of UBC13 family genes among Arabidopsis thaliana, Brassica napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea. Identified gene pairs were displayed by circos plots ( http://circos.ca/ ). All chromosomes from four species are indicated by blocks scaled by chromosome length with chromosome names. The UBC13 family genes and chromosomes from different species are indicated by different colors: red, A. thaliana; yellow, B. napus; purple, B. rapa and green, B. oleracea. Synteny gene pairs are linked by lines: pink, genes with a close relationship to AtUBC13A; brown, genes with a close relationship to AtUBC13B. For gene ID from B. rapa, the species name “_BraROA” is omitted to reduce the length for plotting. Fig. S3. Original images of (A) Fig. 6A and (B) Fig. 6B. Fig. S4. Original images of (A) Fig. 8A and (B) Fig. 8B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8380.207

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→