MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6902165119 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24219973

Review of till geochemistry and indicator mineral methods for mineral exploration in glaciated terrain

2023· article· en· W6902165119 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedrockClastic rockTraction (geology)Sedimentary rockContext (archaeology)CarbonateColluvium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Appendix 3. Photographs of till: A selection of colour photographs of various till facies, from different glaciological, geological, and geographical settings. Photos 1 to 6 illustrate various types of subglacial traction tills that have been sampled for regional surveys by experienced Quaternary researchers across Canada. Photos 7 to 12 show those same tills, and how they would appear when sampling them. Photos 13 and 14 are of meltout tills, that may be sampled in proper context but care must be taken when interpreting the results from those samples. Photo 15 shows a colluvial deposit, comprising till that has been reworked into a gravity flow deposit. Appendix 3-Photo 1. Dense overconsolidated silty sand subglacial traction till with oxidation (organge iron staining) on the joint planes, from a till exposure overlying carbonate bedrock, southwestern Northwest Territories, northern Canada. Note that most of the clasts are subrounded. Knife for scale. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 2. Moderately indurated, weakly jointed, strongly fissle silt-sand subglacial traction till from a till exposure overlying carbonate bedrock, southwestern Northwest Territories, northern Canada. The clasts range from subrounded to subangular. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 3. Dense, overconsolidated clayey-silt subglacial traction till with weak jointing and minimal fissility, from a till exposure overlying Cretaceous sedimentary bedrock of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, northern Alberta, western Canada. Note that the clast content appears to be low because only the indurated (exotic) clasts that are easily seen in the till exposure. Geotool is 75 cm long. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 4. Moderately compact clayey silt subglacial traction till with well-developed jointing and strong fissility, from a till exposure overlying Cretaceous sedimentary bedrock of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, northern Alberta, western Canada. The upper part of the exposure has dried out, resulting in desiccation and separation of the till along shear planes. Hoe pick is 65 cm long. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 5. Meltout till from an exposure of till that was deposited during the recession of the last Irish Ice Sheet. Note the convoluted sandy interbeds. Rock hammer for scale. Photo by Isabelle McMartin. Appendix 3-Photo 6. Dense, strongly jointed, fissile sandy-silt subglacial traction till that is overlain by a weakly compacted sandy-silt meltout till, from an exposure in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, northern Alberta, western Canada. Note the difference in compaction/overconsolidation between the two tills and thus the resulting differences in structure. The grain size distribution and geochemical composition of the two tills are similar, only the depositional environment under the ice sheet is different. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photos 7 to 12. Subglacial traction tills as they appear when sampled. Photo 7: strongly jointed, weakly fissile till on a shovel, collected from the same region as till shown in Photo 1. Small knife for scale. Photo by Roger Paulen; Photo 8: weakly jointed, strongly fissile till on shovel, collected from same area as till shown in Photo 2. Photo by Beth McClenaghan; Photo 9: fissile sandy quartz-rich till on a shovel, collected from the same region as till shown in Photo 13. Photo by Roger Paulen; Photo 10: loose, structureless sandy till on a shovel, collected in permafrost terrain in the same region as Photo 14. Photo by Beth McClenaghan; Photo 11: chunk of clayey-silt till mostly derived from Cretaceous sedimentary bedrock, with few joints and no fissility, collected from the same region as Photo 3. Photo by Roger Paulen; Photo 12: disaggregated nature of strongly jointed and fissile clayey-silt till at bottom of photo, collected from the same region as till shown in Photo 4. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 13. Moderately compacted, sandy subglacial traction till from an exposure in the Proterozoic Athabasca sedimentary basin, northern Saskatchewan, central Canada. When sand-rich till is exposed to the elements, it loses its glacigenic properties due to the paucity of fine-grained matrix material (silt and clay) and it thus resembles loose quartz sand. Photo by Roger Paulen. Appendix 3-Photo 14. Sandy subglacial traction till sampled in a frost boil that formed in a discontinuous permafrost landscape of the Canadian Shield, northern Labrador, eastern Canada. The cryogenic processes in the permafrost active layer have caused the sandy till to lose most of its glacigenic properties. Photo by Beth McClenaghan. Appendix 3-Photo 15. Crudely stratified diamict and bedrock fragments exposed in a 3 m deep exploration trench on the side of a mountain in central British Columbia, western Canada. Despite its till-like appearance, the material consists of subtle beds of clast-supported and matrix supported sediment that gently dip downslope (to the right side of photo) indicating that this material has moved after it was initially deposited as till upslope from this site. This material is not optimal for sampling because it has been displaced downslope. Photo by Roger Paulen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→