MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902195801 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22656582

Iron metabolism-related indicators as predictors of the incidence of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

2023· article· en· W6902195801 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)Observational studyAcute kidney injuryConfidence intervalCardiac surgeryInclusion and exclusion criteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some studies have found that ferroptosis plays an important role in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery. However, whether iron metabolism-related indicators can be used as predictors of the incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery remains unclear. We aimed to systematically evaluate whether iron metabolism-related indicators can be used as predictors of the incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery via meta-analysis. Search methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 1971 to February 2023 to identify prospective observational and retrospective observational studies examining iron metabolism-related indicators and the incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery among adults. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The following data were extracted by two independent authors (ZLM and YXY): date of publication, first author, country, age, sex, number of included patients, iron metabolism-related indicators, outcomes of patients, patient types, study types, sample, and specimen sampling time. The level of agreement between authors was determined using Cohen’s κ value. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of studies. Statistical heterogeneity across the studies was measured by the I2 statistic. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect size measures. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 9 articles on iron metabolism-related indicators and the incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery were included in this study. Meta-analysis revealed that after cardiac surgery, baseline serum ferritin (μg/L) (I2 = 43%, fixed effects model, SMD = −0.3, 95% CI:-0.54 to −0.07, p = 0.010), preoperative and 6-hour postoperative fractional excretion (FE) of hepcidin (%) (I2 = 0.0%, fixed effects model, SMD = −0.41, 95% CI: −0.79 to −0.02, p = 0.038; I2 = 27.0%, fixed effects model, SMD = −0.49, 95% CI: −0.88 to −0.11, p = 0.012), 24-hour postoperative urinary hepcidin (μg/L) (I2 = 0.0%, fixed effects model, SMD = −0.60, 95% CI: −0.82 to −0.37, p < 0.001) and urine hepcidin/urine creatinine ratio (μg/mmoL) (I2 = 0.0%, fixed effects model, SMD = −0.65, 95% CI: −0.86 to −0.43, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients who developed to AKI than in those who did not. After cardiac surgery, patients with lower baseline serum ferritin levels (μg/L), lower preoperative and 6-hour postoperative FE of hepcidin (%), lower 24-hour postoperative hepcidin/urine creatinine ratios (μg/mmol) and lower 24-hour postoperative urinary hepcidin levels (μg/L) are more likely to develop AKI. Therefore, these parameters have the potential to be predictors for AKI after cardiac surgery in the future. In addition, there is a need for relevant clinical research of larger scale and with multiple centers to further test these parameters and prove our conclusion. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022369380.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.072
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207