MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902229893 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23972904

Additional file 1 of Stargardt disease-associated in-frame ABCA4 exon 17 skipping results in significant ABCA4 function

2023· article· en· W6902229893 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsABCA4HEK 293 cellsTransfectionStargardt diseaseDiscriminatorFlicker

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Proband’s baseline full field electroretinography (ffERG) results (ISCEV protocol; MetroVision, Perenchies, France). A Moderately subnormal scotopic rod (dark adapted) responses for both left (OS, oculus sinister) and right eyes (OD, oculus dexter). B Moderately subnormal mixed response (dark adapted), of which the right eye shows a more diminished response. C Subnormal oscillatory responses (dark adapted) for both eyes (OP, oscillatory potential). D Very diminished cone responses (light adapted) in both eyes. E Subnormal flicker response (light adapted) for both eyes. Figure S2. Expression of ABCA4 constructs in HEK293T (A, C) and ARPE-19 (B, D, E) cells. A Coomassie blue stained gel of affinity purified wild-type (WT) and ΔAsp864_Gly885 proteins. B Immunoblot of wild-type (WT) and ΔAsp864_Gly885 proteins from ARPE-19 protein lysates. Vinculin (VCL) was used as loading control. C, D Quantitation showed that ABCA4 ΔAsp864_Gly885 expressed at levels similar to those measured for the WT ABCA4 in both HEK293T and ARPE-19 cells, respectively. Data are shown as mean±SEM. E ARPE-19 cells were transfected with the ABCA4 plasmids, and the localization of ABCA4 was detected using the ABCA4 3F4 clone (yellow). The ER, detected with anti-calnexin (CNX), is shown in magenta. ΔAsp864_Gly885 is associated with intracellular vesicles, that resembles the localization of the WT. Part of the truncated protein is retained in the ER, which was not identified with WT protein. Scale 20 μM. Figure S3. Percentages of ABCA4 Δexon 17 transcripts upon treatment with AONs in the first screening. The AONs were administered to WERI-Rb-1 cells gymnotically and the treatment lasted 48 h. Data are shown as mean±SEM, **p≤0.01, ****p≤0.0001 vs. untreated. Figure S4. Binding location of antisense oligonucleotides in first and second screening. Capital letters display ABCA4 exon 17. Colored horizontal lines represent the binding sites for RNA-splicing proteins (adapted from Alamut Visual Plus). The AONs in red represent the best candidates that were used in treatment of retinal organoids. Figure S5. The expression of retinal markers in retinal organoids (ROs) treated with AONs. All markers show similar expressions between all groups of ROs, except for OPN1MW that showed significant differences in ROs treated with AON24 and AON25 vs. scrambled group. Data are shown as mean±SEM. Asterisks indicated the significant differences in expression vs. scrambled, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. Table S1. List of antisense oligonucleotides. Table S2. List of primers and probes used in dPCR assays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5400.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207