MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902648647 · doi:10.7488/era/3173

Okanagan story and Women in the woods: a critical reflection on pioneer women and their legacy in Canadian literature

2023· other· en· W6902648647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueERA · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsnobodyCanadian literatureCritical reflectionReflection (computer programming)PublishingLife writingInsignificance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AN OKANAGAN STORY: A NOVEL Historian Mike Dunbar is at a crossroads in his career: it’s publish or perish. He chooses publish, his subject: Scottish Settlers in the Okanagan, British Columbia, a fertile valley in the shadows of the Cascades, known for the lake, bountiful orchards, trendy vineyards, and pioneers, specifically, JD Ballantyne. JD is either an enterprising settler or criminal arsonist; nobody seems to know which anymore. But then Mike gets an email from Haley Gibson, JD’s great-great-great-granddaughter. She’s just lost her mother, her connection to the past. Soon, the two find they have more in common than JD. As Haley gets stuck unravelling her complicated family history, and Mike gets closer to solving the mystery of JD, will the answers be the ones they’re looking for? And can their connection survive a breakup, family expectations, major life decisions, and the truth about JD Ballantyne’s life and misdeeds? An Okanagan Story is a novel about Canadian family folklore, dealing with grief, and the realities of just getting by in a sometimes hostile world. WOMEN IN THE WOODS: A CRITICAL REFLECTION ON PIONEER WOMEN AND THEIR LEGACY IN CANADIAN LITERATURE This project examines how the pioneering experiences recounted in Susanna Moodie’s Roughing It in the Bush and Susan Allison’s ‘Recollections of a Pioneer Woman’ contribute to the creation of the pioneer woman character, traditional stories about ‘Canadianness,’ and tropes that form a large part of ‘CanLit.’ The essay explores the ways both authors use the form of memoir, contemplating Sidonie Smith and Maggie Pickering’s writing on how memoir allows women to write about their experiences in male-dominated spaces and overcome barriers that restricted women in the 19th century. The essay also examines how Moodie and Allison become ‘literary foremothers’ to Canadian authors by examining Margaret Atwood’s The Journals of Susanna Moodie, a narrative poem sequence which reframes Moodie’s experience of pioneer life from Atwood’s 20th century urban Canadian perspective. Finally, the essay asks why the story of the pioneer woman continues to appear in ‘CanLit’ despite the loss of the rural backwoods, utilising Helen Thompson’s idea of a ‘shifting frontier.’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueERAFrench-language works237,207