MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902705147 · doi:10.7273/000002421

Resilience of Food Farming in Rapidly Urbanizing Regions

2022· article· en· W6902705147 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWashington State University · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicUrban Agriculture and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgroecologyResilience (materials science)Diversity (politics)Metropolitan areaFood systemsAgricultural biodiversityCrop diversityAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assessing the resilience of farm-level agroecosystems offers a way to inform the allocation of scarce resources needed to sustain local food production in rapidly urbanizing regions. Clark County, Washington, is an understudied part of the Portland–Vancouver metropolitan region, with sprawling development, fragmentation, changing farmer demographics, and a diversity of farm types. This case study sought to answer the following questions: 1) What are current and potential vulnerabilities for urban area food farms? 2) What will be needed to retain and enhance local food production capacity for the long term? and 3) What are useful indicators of environmental, economic, and social resilience for food-producing farms in rapidly urbanizing regions such as Clark County? A resilience theoretical framework and principles of agroecology guided design, data gathering, and analyses. Secondary data informed both the county-level and farm-level analyses. Compiled from several sources, a list of 100 farms was used to select a diversity of farms direct marketing fruits, vegetables, and/or nuts. Primary data collection included: semi-structured interviews and farming system assessments on 23 farms; two farmer roundtables; and participant observation in a broad spectrum of agriculture-focused activities. A farm resilience assessment framework comprising 29 indicators across agronomic, economic, environmental, and social realms was developed to gather, quantify, and analyze data from the study farms. Study farms were found to implement a diversity of innovative agroecological and marketing strategies to help overcome risks. Scores were highest for innovative farms producing a diversity of products for a diversity of markets while protecting the environment. While the literature suggests that diversity and direct marketing improve farm resilience and foster a sustainable local food movement, these results show that such characteristics are insufficient in themselves. Despite performing well by these criteria, 11 of the study farms no longer produce food commercially. Secondary data revealed a 16% reduction in cropland acres in the County (2012—2017). Over 6,000 acres of productive land was converted to urban and/or suburban development (2001—2016). To protect remaining agricultural capacity, this study found an urgent need to reshape local policies, public institutions, and support networks in accordance with stated farmer needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it