MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902863521 · doi:10.7914/pt6y-gc56

Seismic determination of bedload and morphodynamic trends in the Nisqually River of Mount Rainier National Park, WA, USA

2023· dataset· en· W6902863521 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueNSF Seismological Facility for the Advancement of Geoscience (SAGE) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBed loadLandformFloodplainHydrology (agriculture)Sediment transportPrecipitationHyperconcentrated flowErosionSediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are hoping to explore non-contact hydrology techniques, and have landed on the use of seismic signals as one of our data sources. My hope is to use one buried unit full-time for the next three years, and an array of temporary nodes during the warmer months where the ground is more accessible. The buried unit would be located just above the trimline of the Nisqually River near Longmire WA, and the nodes would be distributed in strategic locations proximal to the Nisqually River within the boundaries of Mount Rainier National Park. The location of nodes will be based on collecting signals near areas of specific river geometries with some consideration to not group any units too closely, but the exact location of nodes will depend on conditions during each seasonal deployment. Prior work suggests that signals for bedload, river discharge, and precipitation can be adequately partitioned in order to use seismic signals to generate rating curves for bedload sediment flux in a high-gradient river. At a minimum we expect to relate the appropriate signal for sediment transport to overall magnitudes of transport, and relate those timings to landform evolution trends in the active floodplain on an inner-annual basis. Currently I am looking for one L-22 and one L-28 for full-time occupation near Longmire, and 10 of the IGU-16HR nodes to be dispersed up and down the river. Prior studies for bedload estimates employed the L-28 but claimed the signal attenuated significantly above 100 Hz, my hope is to rule out the need for the high-frequency data in such projects. The area in question near Longmire is free of Wilderness and Historic District restrictions common to most of the Park, and is a candidate for longer occupations and ground disturbance for instrument burial. I am hoping to get a bit more guidance on what I might need for data loggers and power for these units, understanding that housings and power are still something I need to supply. Most of the remaining study area is designated Wilderness and would carry significant permitting burdens to have buried sensors, making the all-in-one nodes more attractive. This is the same reason the USGS has relied on nodes for similar projects on Mount Rainier and Mount St. Helens. The IGU-16HR units in particular appear to have modular batteries which makes them more suitable for extended occupations beyond the normal one-month deployment, with the goal of capturing as much of the season from May-Oct. as possible. My primary technical collaborator for seismology needs related to this project is Weston Thelen of the USGS Cascades Volcanoes Observatory, and remaining support for field work and geomorphology analysis will be provided by myself and the Mount Rainier National Park Imminent Threats Program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNSF Seismological Facility for the Advancement of Geoscience (SAGE)French-language works237,207