Insights and Advancing Mental Health Care: The Utility of Administrative Health Records
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AHRs' efficacy in mental health research. These papers are meant to showcase the application of machine learning (ML) to predict opioid overdose risks, the examination of developmental disorder utilization shifts within the Alberta healthcare system, and the impact of the pandemic on neurocognitive disorder trends and healthcare demands. These examples underline the diverse applications and insights AHRs can provide into mental health issues. Looking to the future, the dissertation advocates for broadening AHRs' applications, including their potential in post-disaster mental health outcome predictions. It proposes an integration of AHRs with wearable device data, aiming to transform mental health care from a traditionally reactive approach to a proactive and preventive strategy. This forward-thinking perspective envisions a system where real-time data from wearables enriches AHRs, offering nuanced, immediate insights into individual mental health statuses. Overall, the dissertation aims to comprehensively dissect the capacity of AHRs to revolutionize mental health care research and practice. It not only addresses the challenges of privacy and the necessity for cross-sector collaboration but also demonstrates the practical applications of AHRs in current mental health scenarios and anticipates their future role in advancing mental health care, especially in contexts affected by disasters. This work not only highlights the present state of mental health care research but also recommends new directions for future innovations in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.119 | 0.306 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".