Application\nof a Solar UV/Chlorine Advanced Oxidation\nProcess to Oil Sands Process-Affected Water Remediation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The\nsolar UV/chlorine process has emerged as a novel advanced oxidation\nprocess for industrial and municipal wastewaters. Currently, its practical\napplication to oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) remediation\nhas been studied to treat fresh OSPW retained in large tailings ponds,\nwhich can cause significant adverse environmental impacts on ground\nand surface waters in Northern Alberta, Canada. Degradation of naphthenic\nacids (NAs) and fluorophore organic compounds in OSPW was investigated.\nIn a laboratory-scale UV/chlorine treatment, the NAs degradation was\nclearly structure-dependent and hydroxyl radical-based. In terms of\nthe NAs degradation rate, the raw OSPW (pH ∼ 8.3) rates were\nhigher than those at an alkaline condition (pH = 10). Under actual\nsunlight, direct solar photolysis partially degraded fluorophore organic\ncompounds, as indicated by the qualitative synchronous fluorescence\nspectra (SFS) of the OSPW, but did not impact NAs degradation. The\nsolar/chlorine process effectively removed NAs (75–84% removal)\nand fluorophore organic compounds in OSPW in the presence of 200 or\n300 mg L<sup>–1</sup> OCl<sup>–</sup>. The acute toxicity\nof OSPW toward Vibrio fischeri was\nreduced after the solar/chlorine treatment. However, the OSPW toxicity\ntoward goldfish primary kidney macrophages after solar/chlorine treatment\nshowed no obvious toxicity reduction versus that of untreated OSPW,\nwhich warrants further study for process optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".