A descriptive study of the Canadian population with schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Schizophrenia occurs throughout the world, with a prevalence thought to be approximately 1% of the population over the age of 18.In 2004, there were an estimated 234,305 people in Canada with Schizophrenia.Previous research has found that those with Schizophrenia have poor physical health compared to the general population.Health determinants and their use of health care services may also differ in people with Schizophrenia.Purpose: The main goal of this study was to describe certain health status indicators, health determinants, and health care service use among Canadian household residents with Schizophrenia.Methods: The Canadian Community Health Survey Cycle 3.1 Master file was analyzed.There was a total sample size of 132,947 with 405 who reported being diagnosed with schizophrenia.Results: Overall those with Schizophrenia had a poorer health status, more comorbid health conditions, a more problematic profile of determinants of health and more unmet health care needs than the general population.However, they were not less likely to have a regular family physician or to engage in a set of preventive activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".