MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6903239837 · doi:10.1021/jp810715t.s001

A DFT Study of Nucleobase Dealkylation by the DNA Repair Enzyme AlkB

2016· article· en· W6903239837 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlkBNucleobaseAlkylationDNADensity functional theoryRadicalDNA repairEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxidative dealkylation is a unique mechanistic pathway found in the α-ketoglutarate-Fe(II)-dependent AlkB family of enzymes to remove the alkylation damage to DNA bases and regenerate nucleobases to their native state. The B3LYP density functional combined with a self-consistent reaction field was used to explore the triplet, quintet, and septet spin-state potential energy surfaces of the multistep catalytic mechanism of AlkB. The mechanism was found to consist of four stages. First, binding of dioxygen to iron in the active-site complex occurs concerted with electron transfer, thereby yielding a ferric-superoxido species. Second, competing initiation for the activation of oxygen to generate the high-valent iron−oxygen intermediates (ferryl-oxo Fe<sup>IV</sup>O and ferric-oxyl Fe<sup>III</sup>O<sup>•</sup> species) was found to occur on the quintet and septet surfaces. Then, conformational reorientation of the activated iron−oxygen ligand was found to be nearly thermoneutral with a barrier of ca. 50 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>. The final stage is the oxidative dealkylation of the damaged nucleobase with the rate-controlling step being the abstraction of a hydrogen atom from the damaging methyl group by the ferryl-oxo ligand. For this step, the calculated barrier of 87.4 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup> is in good agreement with the experimental activation energy of ca. 83 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup> for the enzyme-catalyzed reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2960.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation MechanismsFrench-language works237,207