MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6903245699 · doi:10.11575/prism/42718

Investigation of Fine-Scaled Reservoir Heterogeneity within the Sulphur Mountain Formation

2024· other· en· W6903245699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrophysicsOutcropSedimentary rockBeddingLaminationFracture (geology)Permeability (electromagnetism)Hydraulic fracturingWell logging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study integrates two perspectives to comprehensively assess the geological and reservoir characteristics of the Sulphur Mountain Formation within the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, an outcrop analog of the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, one of Canada's largest unconventional plays. The unconventional resource plays' reservoir quality and production optimization relies on a nuanced understanding of geomechanical rock properties and their influence on fractures and fracture networks in the subsurface. Challenges in studying subsurface fractures, particularly the lateral constraints of petrophysical and core data, have prompted the utilization of outcrop analogs to enhance understanding. This research examines the rock fabric control on natural fractures in the Montney Formation's outcrop-equivalent, employing an up to 36 m thick, well-exposed outcrop of the Sulphur Mountain Formation. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based photomosaics are utilized to characterize the outcrop, evaluating natural fracture distribution. A novel methodology utilizing high-resolution scanned core images is introduced to quantify lamination and assess sedimentary fabric. Results indicate a discernible relationship between sedimentary fabric and fracture characteristics, shedding light on the geometry of fracture networks and aiding predictions of fracture behavior in fine-grained rocks in the subsurface. Additionally, this study investigates fine-grained reservoir heterogeneity, a critical factor for hydraulic fracturing operations, influenced by parameters such as clay content, lamination, and bedding planes. Hyperspectral imaging emerges as a valuable non-destructive analytical technique, effectively measuring composition without damaging the sample. Its application overcomes limitations of geophysical well logs in heterogeneous lithologies, playing a crucial role in defining heterogeneity. This research further identifies Hyperspectral core scanning as a valuable tool for characterizing fine-scale facies variations and underscores the challenge of constructing an accurate compositional model when the training data has a low variance. To enhance model correlation, the study suggests optimizing the data variance to measurement error range ratio. X-ray diffraction (XRD) is proposed as a tool to increase data variance, addressing the heightened standard deviation observed in the investigation. This integrated project emphasizes the pivotal role of hyperspectral imaging in enhancing core analysis and provides a holistic perspective on reservoir heterogeneity in unconventional plays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→