MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6903271552 · doi:10.11575/prism/42814

Integrating Field-Based Knowledge of Alpine Aquifers in Basin-Scale Hydrological Models

2024· other· en· W6903271552 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGlobal Water FuturesAlberta InnovatesCanada First Research Excellence FundParks Canada
KeywordsAquiferBaseflowWatershedGroundwaterStructural basinHydrology (agriculture)Groundwater flowSpatial variability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Talus and moraine serve as vital groundwater reservoirs, with their associated capability to modulate the baseflow of major rivers that originate in headwater environments. Recent field-based studies conducted in the Canadian Rocky Mountains have identified a nonlinear storage-discharge relationship expressed by these surficial alpine aquifers and the importance of their spatial positioning and extent in headwater environments. However, few studies have tried to upscale our current small-scale understanding of these surficial units, to better understand how their storage-discharge dynamics influence basin-scale (i.e. 10^3-10^4 km^2) hydrology. This study aimed to develop a means to integrate several representative features associated with alpine aquifers into a basin-scale hydrological model to potentially improve its capability to estimate and predict the baseflow of mountain rivers. Specifically, this study developed a simple object-oriented image classification workflow to map the spatial extent and distribution of talus and moraine, among other alpine landcover, in addition to validating the capability of a previously discerned simple exponential function to emulate the aforementioned groundwater storage-discharge relationship expressed by alpine aquifers. The resulting object-oriented workflow did well to capture the spatial variability of the aquifers present in the 2228 km^2 Upper Bow River Basin in Alberta Canada, yielding an overall accuracy rating of 90%, while providing an efficient means to extract the aquifer’s spatial characteristics. The exponential function was then tested in a small first-order watershed in the Canadian Rocky Mountains and simulated watershed’s groundwater storage-discharge dynamics to a similar accuracy compared to a distributed physically-based groundwater flow model implemented in the same area. This suggests that the function potentially has the capacity to be integrated as the new baseflow function in a basin-scale hydrologic model and likely improve its capability to accurately estimate and predict the baseflow of mountain rivers. The underlying framework of the Modélisation Environnementale communautaire (MEC) - Surface Hydrology (MESH) model, a basin-scale hydrological model widely implemented in alpine regions in Canada, is presented to demonstrate how these representative features associated with alpine aquifers could be integrated into such a model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→