Customized Biomimetic Tendon Pullley in Cable-Driven Robots: A Parametric Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In cable-driven robotic systems, the design of Biomimetic Tendon Pulleys, which serve as conduits for tendon movement, is crucial for minimizing friction, reducing mechanical wear, and ensuring efficient force transmission. This paper presents a parametric design approach for customizing Biomimetic Tendon Pulleys in robotic applications. By leveraging parametric techniques, the design process is automated, allowing for real-time optimization of key parameters such as Biomimetic pulley curvature, material properties, and geometric configuration. Mathematical modeling using Bezier curves to achieve a smooth transition along the tendon path, significantly reducing frictional losses. The proposed approach is demonstrated through the design of a Biomimetic Tendon Pulley for a biomimetic robotic finger, which leads to the expected improvement in movement resolution and a significant reduction in frictional forces. This study provides a robust framework for developing customized Biomimetic Tendon Pulleys across a wide range of robotic systems, improving overall efficiency, durability, and performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".