MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6903324194 · doi:10.11575/prism/35667

Drainage Organization and Sea-Level History of the Early Cretaceous McMurray Formation, Northeastern Alberta, Canada

2018· other· en· W6903324194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousAptianForeland basinMarine transgressionDrainage basinDrainageSedimentary rockChannel (broadcasting)Drainage system (geomorphology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The densely penetrated McMurray Formation of northeastern Alberta, Canada records the activity of a continental-scale river and marginal-marine sedimentary system, providing a unique opportunity to: (1) test for an Aptian glacio-eustatic signal within the Western Canadian Foreland Basin, and (2) evaluate a well-preserved drainage system at the basin-scale. Three distinct incised valleys and one deltaic channel system subtending from upward-coarsening deltaic parasequence sets are documented across an area >26,000 km2. At least six high frequency cycles of transgression and regression are apparent within the McMurray Formation stratigraphy. The high frequency nature of these Aptian sequences suggests that the sea-level oscillations recorded in McMurray Formation strata are consistent with a glacio-eustatic driver. By integrating measured bankfull flow depths and catchment area estimates from the stratigraphically distinct channelized systems, details about Aptian drainage organization can be gleaned. Data collected in this study suggest that the McMurray drainage system was fed by both an axial, continental-scale river system and a smaller transversely-sourced drainage network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)French-language works237,207