MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6903377447 · doi:10.11575/prism/dspace/41272

Temporal Trends in Hospitalization Rates for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the 21st Century: a systematic review and population-based cohort study

2022· other· en· W6903377447 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseIncidence (geometry)CohortUlcerative colitisCohort studyPopulationDiseaseEpidemiologyMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Individuals living with IBD are heavily burdened for life and may require medication reliance, hospitalization, or surgery. There are a plethora of studies investigating hospitalization rates, but literature is highly heterogeneous methodologically and has never been comprehensively synthesized. Therefore, the aim of this thesis is to conduct a systematic review of global IBD hospitalization trends and a population-based Alberta cohort study that will contribute to the literature.Medline and Embase were systematically searched for population-based studies reporting annual IBD, Crohn’s disease (CD), or ulcerative colitis (UC) hospitalizations counts, hospitalization rates per 100,000 persons, or hospitalization rates per 100 IBD population. Using log-linear models, temporal trends in hospitalization rates were analyzed. Random effects meta-analysis pooled country level Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC). Data were stratified by the epidemiologic stage of a region: Compounding Prevalence (Stage 3) in North America, Western Europe, and Oceania versus Acceleration of Incidence (Stage 2) in Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America versus Emergence (Stage 1) in developing countries.Population-based administrative databases from Alberta, Canada, were used to identify a cohort of individuals with IBD from 2002 to 2018. Primary (i.e., most responsible diagnoses) and all-cause IBD hospitalization rates were calculated using the prevalent Alberta IBD population and then compared to rates using the general population as the denominator. Rates were age and sex standardized to the Canadian population. Log-linear models calculated AAPC in hospitalization rates with 95% CI.iiiHospitalization rates for IBD are stabilizing in countries in Stage 3, whereas newly industrialized countries in Stage 2 have rapidly rising hospitalization rates, contributing to an increasing burden on global healthcare systems. In Alberta, IBD hospitalization rates are decreasing for both primary admissions for a flare and all-cause hospitalizations. Differences in temporal trends when assessing hospitalization rates using the general population rather than the IBD prevalent population may be due to the rapidly rising prevalence of IBD. Therefore, calculation of rates using the IBD prevalent population may more accurately represent burden and trends in hospitalization rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.013
Bibliometrics0.0070.012
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→