A Generalizable Prompt-Based Prototypical Framework for CSI-Based Few-Shot and Cross-Domain Activity Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless sensing systems for human activity recognition (HAR) have made great strides in recent years. However, current HAR models face challenges in generalization due to a limited number of training samples (i.e., few-shot problem) and pattern differences of the collected channel state information (CSI) data across diverse domains (i.e., cross-domain problem). To address the above problems, in this paper, we propose a prompt-based prototypical framework called Wi-Prompt. Our Wi-Prompt framework consists of the following three modules: Prompt generation module, prototypical representation module, and activity recognition module, which works as follows. Prompt generation module is developed to extract prior knowledge from samples in the source domains, providing insightful guidance for establishing class prototypes in the target domains. Prototypical representation module effectively captures the most representative prototype vector of each class with a temporal convolutional network (TCN)-attention model. Activity recognition module determines the activity class of new sample by comparing the Euclidean distance between its corresponding prototype vector and the prototype vector of each class. The greatest advantage of Wi-Prompt is its utilization of prompt-based prototype representation, which eliminates the need for prior domain-specific knowledge about the original CSI samples, making it highly adaptable to a wide variety of CSI datasets collected across different domains. Extensive experiment results based on real-world traces show that our proposed Wi-Prompt outperforms state-of-the-art models under various cross-domain scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".