MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6903401397 · doi:10.11575/prism/39771

Roosting behaviour of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in the Canadian Rocky Mountains

2022· other· en· W6903401397 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsectivoreMyotis lucifugusEptesicus fuscusEndangered speciesNatural (archaeology)Human echolocationReproductive success

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) are highly adaptable bats that occur throughout most of North America. The presence of reproductive individuals in northern and mountainous environments is surprising, however, as small, volant, insectivorous mammals should face many challenges to surviving and reproducing in regions with short, cool summers. The objective of my research was to examine the roosting ecology of female little brown bats in Banff and Yoho National Parks, with a focus on the relative importance of building and natural roosts, to help understand how populations persist in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Better understanding little brown bat ecology is also important given the endangered listing of this species in Canada and by the IUCN.Over two summers, I captured little brown bats at varying distances from buildings, and tracked 49 females to their day roosts. Buildings were the dominant roost type used throughout the reproductive period, and the only structures in which bats formed maternity colonies. Building roosts were particularly relied on by bats in May and June, and by lactating bats. Bats monitored in building roosts were often warmer than those in natural roosts, suggesting that the benefits of building roosts are their warm microclimates. Buildings also appeared to shape the distribution of female little brown bats; reproductive females remained near building clusters, and all females remained near municipalities. Despite the apparent importance of building roosts, building colonies were unusually small, and bats had relatively low fidelity to building roosts, suggesting that building roosts may not consistently meet bats’ needs. Some non-reproductive and pregnant females also frequently used natural roosts, particularly after colder nights. This, combined with bats’ lower skin temperature in natural roosts, points to an importance of natural roosts in facilitating torpor. My results suggest that little brown bats may successfully reproduce in cold environments by relying on warm building roosts. However, natural roosts are likely important in allowing pregnant bats and non-reproductive bats to save energy. Because bats are long-lived with low reproductive output and low juvenile survival, the survival of both reproductive and non-reproductive individuals is important for population stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→