MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6903522422 · doi:10.11575/prism/dspace/41130

Prenatal anxiety and breastfeeding outcomes: a prospective study

2021· other· en· W6903522422 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Calgary · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingAnxietyPregnancyProspective cohort studyCohort studyConfoundingLongitudinal studyOdds ratio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prenatal anxiety is a common maternal mental health condition that affects both maternal and infant health. There are established associations between depression and reduced breastfeeding duration; however, little is known about the relationship between prenatal anxiety and breastfeeding outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the association between prenatal anxiety and breastfeeding outcomes in a large longitudinal pregnancy cohort.Methods: Data were obtained from the All Our Families prospective community cohort of mother-infant pairs recruited in early pregnancy from Calgary, Alberta (n = 1473). Anxiety was measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) during early and late pregnancy. The primary outcome of breastfeeding duration and secondary outcomes (breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity, difficulties, and cessation) were self-reported at 4 and 12 months postpartum. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to examine the associations between prenatal anxiety and each breastfeeding outcome while controlling for potential confounding variables as appropriate. Results: Overall, 18% of mothers reported clinically significant anxiety during pregnancy. Mothers with high prenatal anxiety reported shorter duration for any breastfeeding compared to those without (? = -4.43 weeks, [95% CI: -6.51, -7.94, -0.93)] after controlling for confounders. Having high prenatal anxiety was associated with lower odds of any breastfeeding at 4 months (OR = 0.68, [95% CI: 0.48, 0.95]) and 6 months (OR = 0.65, [95% CI: 0.54, 0.88]). No significant associations were observed between prenatal anxiety and breastfeeding initiation (AOR = 0.93, [95% CI: 0.42, 2.08]), exclusive breastfeeding for at least 4 months (AOR = 0.92, [95% CI: 0.66, 1.28]) and 6 months (AOR = 0.74, [95% CI: 0.45, 1.21]), or breastfeeding difficulties (AOR = 0.86, [95% CI: 0.48, 1.56]), respectively.Conclusion: Prenatal anxiety was associated with shorter breastfeeding duration and may be a risk factor for premature breastfeeding cessation. Targeted interventions specific to needs of mothers with prenatal anxiety may be beneficial in supporting optimal breastfeeding goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of CalgaryFrench-language works237,207