MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6903537334 · doi:10.11575/prism/dspace/41129

Tailoring Nanoparticle Designs for Cleaning up Oil Sands Process-affected Water

2021· other· en· W6903537334 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsNanoparticleDispersion (optics)Filtration (mathematics)AsphalteneFilter (signal processing)AsphaltFlocculationTailingsSynthetic crude

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oil sands industry in Canada continuously produces enormous volume of toxic and low-quality oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) as a result of bitumen extraction, upgrading, and transportation. Typically, OSPW are treated by several chemical treatment stages that primarily focus on water recycling at high capital and operating costs with high environmental footprints. In this study, naturally sourced nanoparticles were designed for cleaning up OSPW through effective and combined process. Thus, nanoparticles with tunable properties were developed to generate hybrid filter media, nanoflocculants, and oil spill nanoscavengers. For the case of steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) produced water, under ambient conditions, hybrid filter media were manufactured via integrating low percentage (< 5 wt%) of iron hydroxide nanoparticles with walnut shell filter media (WS), in which the iron hydroxide nanoparticles elevated the active surface area for simultaneous removal of total organic carbon (TOC) and silica. For the tailing water, titanomagnetite nanoparticles, naturally known as ironsand, were synthesized uner ambient conditions and grafted with hydrophobically modified polyacrylamide with lauryl sulfate, forming novel nanoflocculant that was applied to flocculate the mature fine tailings (MFT). Furthermore, the bare titanomagnetite nanoparticles were employed for removal of crude oil spills, following our modified ASTM protocol. The results showed that the hybrid filtration media (WS-NPs) removed up to 85% of silica and TOC through the batch experiments. In the column tests WS-NPs significantly improved the breakthrough behavior without reaching pressure drop limitations. The column breakthrough behaviors were successfully described by a dimensionless advection-axial dispersion model, that was able to accurately capture the real breakthrough behavior, indicating the possibility of scaling up the filter using a combined unit that removes silica and TOC simultaneously. Also, flocculation of the MFT suspension with applying 3000 ppm of the optimized nanoflocculants, against 20,000 ppm of commercially anionic polyacrylamide, provided 15 times faster initial settling rate (ISR) and half values of supernatant turbidity, capillary suction time (CST), and specific resistance to filtration (SRF). Interestingly, a gram of our inhouse prepared iron sand nanoparticles removed 38g crude oil, showing outstanding performance toward oil spill removal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→