Hosting the Economic Leaders’ Meeting 1997: Canada and APEC
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On 24th-25th November, 1997, Canada hosted the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in Vancouver. The federal government as well as many provincial leaders used this opportunity to present their country as a nation maintaining a multitude of cultural, political, economic and social ties with other countries in the Asia Pacific, in short, as a country which belongs to the region. Therefore, a multifaceted program was designed to precede and surround last year’s APEC activities and 1997 was declared ‘Canada’s Year of the Asia Pacific’. Apart from helping to build a sense of community in the Asia Pacific region, the strategy aimed at achieving some very concrete, mainly economic goals. This article analyzes three of these goals in detail, namely Canada’s interest in reducing its dependence on the U.S. market, in stimulating exports to the region, and in attracting business immigrants from Asia. Based on these determinants the paper examines Canada’s APEC policy, putting great emphasis on the government’s strategy for the 1997 meeting and assessing its success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it