MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6904640513 · doi:10.14288/1.0448095

Evaluating cumulative temperature indicators for heat alert and response systems : a case study in Vancouver, British Columbia

2025· article· en· W6904640513 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman body temperatureWork (physics)Emergency responseHeat waveAir temperature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extreme heat events (EHEs) are escalating in frequency, intensity, and duration due to climate change, posing significant health risks. To mitigate their impacts, many countries, including Canada, have established heat-health warning systems (HHWSs). However, these systems often rely on absolute temperature thresholds that require all conditions to be met simultaneously. This rigidity can overlook different sequences of day-night heat that accumulate over multiple days, potentially leading to missed warnings. In this study, seven cumulative temperature metrics were created by summing daily high and overnight low temperatures over one to three days. To assess each metric’s relationship with all-cause mortality, heat-related ED visits, and ambulance dispatches in Western Metro Vancouver (WMV) from 2008-2023, generalized additive models with negative binomial distributions were fitted. The statistical performance of the metrics was evaluated using significance tests, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and forecasting accuracy. All cumulative metrics demonstrated stable and comparable statistical performance. Given its applicability, the High+Low+High (HLH) metric—summing two daily highs and one overnight low—was selected as an example for further analyses. A split value analysis was performed by dividing HLH into one hundred equally spaced intervals and creating a binary variable for each interval, refitting a model to determine the odds ratio (OR) at each split. Points at which the OR for the three outcomes became significantly greater than 1.0 were designated as baseline thresholds. 58°C (all-cause mortality), 47°C (ED visits), and 42°C (ambulance dispatches) were identified as the baseline points. Using the mortality-based threshold as a template, further “separate baseline thresholds” of 51°C and 15°C were identified for two daily highs (HH) and overnight low (L) respectively. Accordingly, an HLH threshold algorithm was formulated such that the OR of mortality exceeds 1.0 when HLH ≥ 58°C and either L ≥ 15°C or HH ≥ 51°C. Subgroup analyses demonstrated elevated risks among individuals with cardiovascular, renal, or respiratory conditions, mental illnesses, multiple comorbidities, or lower socioeconomic status. Overall, this study developed methods for a more dynamic and flexible HHWS framework to issue heat alerts, offering a multi-trigger approach that can better account for cumulative day-night heat sequences. [An errata to this thesis was added on 2025-10-20.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207