MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6904661140 · doi:10.14288/1.0444062

The effects of social media sentiment on stock price : a study of the Canadian energy sector

2024· article· en· W6904661140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaStock (firearms)Stock priceGranger causalityPredictive powerOil priceDigital mediaCorporate governance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates the intricate relationship between digital discourse, specifically social media sentiment, and stock price within the Canadian oil and gas industry from 2020-2021. The research comprises two distinct yet complementary studies that collectively shed light on the complex dynamics at play. The first study examines the predictive capacity of non-financial Twitter sentiment on stock prices across nine prominent Canadian oil and gas companies. Employing Granger causality tests, the findings reveal no significant influence of social media sentiment on stock prices within the sample. This contradicts previous studies suggesting a predictive relationship and highlights the potential dominance of market-level sentiment over individual company sentiment, as well as the diminished impact of non-financial discourse on investor decisions. The study bolsters past research which indicates the diminishing power of external stakeholders over firms in the digital era. The second study delves deeper into the relationship between digital discourse and stock price, focusing on Enbridge Inc. and TC Energy Corp. Granger causality tests reveal statistically significant forecasting abilities of Twitter sentiment on stock prices during shortened timeframes surrounding peak Twitter volume dates for these two companies. However, qualitative analysis suggests that stock price movement may be affected more by traditional media coverage than social media sentiment. The findings suggest that the impact of digital discourse on stock price may be company-specific and depend on the nature and intensity of the discourse. Nationally viewed political events or controversies appear to be potential catalysts for movement on stock prices. Additionally, specific RepRisk categories related to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors were shared between Enbridge and TC Energy, indicating their potential salience in this relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207