MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6904731924 · doi:10.14288/1.0129080

Part 2, Section 2, Plate 15

2009· other· fr· W6904731924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2009
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Section (typography)Work safetyLimiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On voit, fig. 1, des Canadiens qui boucanent des Saumons: en A, il y en a un qui les lave, & en B d'autres en étendent sur un grillage de bois, sous lequel il y a du feu, pour les fumer & les dessécher. On voit à la figure 2 des Habitants du Nord, dans les petits bateaux qui leur serventà pêcher dans leurs rivières: les uns A, pagayent; & les autres B, rament. On a représenté, à la figure 3, différents bâtiments de construction, la plupart Ecossoise, qui servent pour le commerce du Saumon. Quelquefois ceux qui vont au Nord faire ce commerce en achètent de frais des naturels du Pays, & ils les salent en verd avec du sel qu'ils ont apporté dans leurs bâtiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4410.302

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→French-language works237,207→