Visualizing Pedagogy and Power with Urban Native Youth: Exposing the Legacy of the Indian Residential School System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Indian Residential School System, an institution of colonization that reflects Whiteracist culture, has had deleterious effects on the lived social reality of Indigenous peoplesin Canada. The intergenerational effects are manifested in social, cultural, economic,political, spiritual, mental, emotional, physical, and linguistic ways. Sadly, citizensof Canada are overwhelmingly unaware and misinformed about the Indian ResidentialSchool System's egregious legacy. This article represents one attempt by descendantsof the Indian Residential School System to interrogate the mnemonic landscape ofCanada—one that has a tradition of forgetting, erasing, or making invisible Indigenouspeoples histories, their realities and their existence. Using photovoice methodology,three urban Native youth helped to answer the question, "How do urban Native youthinterpret and experience the intergenerational effects of the Indian Residential SchoolSystem in Canada?” Through a critical examination of their photographs, my researchpartners visualized pedagogy and power by engaging in critical consciousness, byeducating the greater community, and by talking back to the master narrative ofCanadian society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it