MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6904786472 · doi:10.14288/1.0422750

Mountain glaciers as modifiers of streamflow in Western Canada : insights from data analysis and machine learning

2022· article· en· W6904786472 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreamflowGlacierFlood forecastingClimate changePrecipitationSurface runoff

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the social, ecological, and cultural importance of glaciers and glacier-fed rivers, a quantification of key glacier controls of streamflow remain elusive and outstanding questions persist. For example: which communities’ water supplies are most vulnerable to the loss of glacier ice? By how much do glaciers modify the streamflow response to heatwaves? First, I use principal component analysis, self-organizing maps, and multivariate linear regression to provide an assessment of community vulnerability to deglaciation in Alberta, Canada, by identifying and predicting signals of glacier runoff in historical streamflow datasets. I combine these models with a new dataset of community water supply sources to find that the most vulnerable locations are the communities of Hinton, Lake Louise, and Rocky Mountain House, as well as the Bighorn Dam, which forms the largest reservoir in the province and provides water for over a million people downstream. Next, I develop an accurate and interpretable convolutional long short-term memory neural network regional hydrological model for streamflow prediction across Alberta and British Columbia, Canada. This deep machine learning model is forced by gridded ERA5 temperature and precipitation data and predicts streamflow at 226 stream gauge stations. Finally, I use this model to systematically investigate the streamflow response to heatwaves. I determine how this streamflow response varies by basin glacier coverage, as well as by heatwave timing, duration, and intensity, under both normal and warmer climate scenarios. I quantify how increasing glacier coverage is associated with both increasing streamflow generation during summer heatwaves, as well as increasing compensation in summer to the loss of snow during spring heatwaves. My results advance understanding on multiple research fronts in glaciology and hydrology: I demonstrate the importance of local-scale water resource data for glacier runoff projections; I emphasize the interpretability of deep machine learning models as a means to apply machine learning to new frontiers in hydrology; and I offer new frameworks and metrics to understand and characterize the hydrological impacts of heatwaves. My findings motivate future inter- and trans-disciplinary research to develop better deep learning hydrological models, and make progress towards answering politically and socially relevant glacio-hydrological research questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→