MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6904894660 · doi:10.14288/bcs.v0i149.1783

Book Reviews

2010· article· en· W6904894660 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreatyPoliticsDowntownWhite (mutation)Performance artEconomic Justice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Into the House of Old: A History of Residential Care in British Columbia by Megan Davies -Reviewed by Patricia Vertinsky (pgs: 87-9) • Between Justice and Certainty: Treaty Making in British Columbia by Andrew Woolford -Reviewed by Paulette Regan (pgs: 89-91) • Musqueam Reference Grammar by Wayne Suttles -Reviewed by Dorothy Kennedy (pgs: 91-4) • Islands in the Salish Sea: A Community Atlas by Sheila Harrington, Judi Stevenson -Reviewed by Coll Thrush (pgs: 94-6) • Jean Coulthard: A Life in Music by William Bruneau, David Gordon Duke -Reviewed by Janette Tilley (pgs: 96-7) • Raincoast Chronicles Fourth Five by Howard White -Reviewed by Jocelyn Smith (pgs: 98-9) • Pro- Family Politics and Fringe Parties in Canada by Chris MacKenzie -Reviewed by John Dyck (pgs: 99-101) • In Plain Sight: Reflections on Life in Downtown Eastside Vancouver by Leslie Robertson, Dara Culhane -Reviewed by Lara Campbell (pgs: 101-2) • Marine Life of the Pacific Northwest: A Photographic Encyclopedia of Invertebrates, Seaweeds and Selected Fishes by Andy Lamb, Bernard P. Hanby -Reviewed by Tony J. Pitcher (pgs: 103-4) • Homefront and Battlefront: Nelson BC in World War II by Sylvia Crooks -Reviewed by Duff Sutherland (pgs: 105-6)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6410.636

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207