MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6904917259 · doi:10.14288/1.0135387

Prism international

2015· article· en· W6904917259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal case studies and regulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryCONTESTGeorge (robot)PrismAnnalsBedroom

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following description is provided by the publisher: Fiction & Poetry Contest Issue Judge’s Essay by Fiction Contest Judge Zsuzsi Gartner Judge’s Essay by Poetry Contest Judge Rhea Tregebov FICTION Grand Prize Winner “Roadnotes” by Eliza Robertson Runners-up “The Dead Roads” by D.W. Wilson “The Fur Trader’s Daughter” by Seyward Goodhand POETRY Grand Prize winner “Owl on the roof” by Joelene Heathcote Runners-up “Leap” by Leslie Vryenhoek “The Big Siesta (or: The End of Modern Warfare)” by Patricia Young FICTION “The Slums of Kitsilano” by Eden Robinson POETRY “Fairway” / “This poem has been modified from its original version. It has been modified to fit this space.” by Antony DiNardo “Dixville Notch” / “Hoser” by Regan Taylor “Dissolve” by Nathan Baker “Fly Dying on the Bedroom Floor” by Kevin Bushell “Having Passed Down a Hall to a Room with Yellow Seats Labelled ‘Cebupacific,’ a TV Squawking, Under Hissing Lights” / “We Will Recognize Them!” by John Wall Barger “Bloodroot” / “Hiding the Erotic Inclination” / “Swim Trunks” / “The Sources of the Self” by Jan Conn “I Think I Dreamed of Wings” by Robert Gore “Euclidean” / “Castaway” by George Sipos “Linkage” / “Gatineau Pastoral for a Gent Who Waits Table in the Rockies” / “Cloud Puffs above a Ridge-top Barbeque Grill” by Peter Richardson

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7960.688

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicLegal case studies and regulationsFrench-language works237,207