Contested Context: Welcoming Diverse International Indigenous Colleagues to Unceded Musqueam Territory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article draws on the perspectives of five Indigenous women from diverse culturaland academic backgrounds. It is also based on an analysis oftzvo experiences in 2013and 2014 that occurred on unceded Muscjueam First Nations territory, at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), and on cededMaori lands at Massey University in Albany, New Zealand. Collectively, the authorsaddress various aspects of what it means to lndigenize the international academy inCanada and Aotearoa/New Zealand. It also examines specific themes in relation totheir Indigenous locations in the colonial post-secondary institutions and Indigenouscommunities of Canada and New Zealand. Specifically, this article considers Canada'sand New Zealand's Indigenous perspectives on community engagement, teachingand learning, research, governance, human resources, and student success in relationto the principles of legal sovereignty, cultural self-determination, activism, rights,and reconciliation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.045 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.020 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".