Korean pastors' perspectives on the mental health and related needs of the Korean-Canadian community
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explored the perspectives of Korean pastors on the mental health and related needs of Korean-Canadians. Pastors were the focus of this study due to their community leadership roles within the Church, which could offer them unique insights into the Korean immigrant community. This qualitative study aimed to identify the needs of the community, the role of the church in meeting those needs, and what pastors believed would help them foster mental health and well-being in their congregants. Seven Korean pastors with diverse backgrounds and experiences were interviewed using a semi-structured guide. Using interpretive description (Thorne et al., 1997), the findings from the thematic analysis were contextualized within the framework of Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological model (1979). The study revealed four main themes. The first theme identified unique mental health concerns of different generations of Korean-Canadian immigrants. In 1st generation immigrants, social isolation was the main stressor, whereas economic and general life stressors were of greater concern for 1.5 and 2nd generation immigrants. The second theme discussed faith's dual role in mental health. Although the hope provided through faith was a strong protective factor against mental health concerns, faith also had the potential to adversely impact mental health. The third theme explored the church's role as a place for social support and cultural connection. Differences between the older, 1st generation and the younger, 2nd generation of immigrants were evident. Theme three also highlighted pastors’ acknowledgements of their own limitations in supporting mental health concerns within their congregations. Finally, the fourth theme focused on pastors' desire for psychoeducation and preferred formats for the delivery of this information, as well as their views on collaborating with mental health professionals and preference for Korean-Christian professionals. The multi-faceted role of the Korean-Canadian church provides many opportunities to foster the mental health of Korean immigrants. It is crucial to understand the differences within this population and contextualize them within the stressors unique to the Korean immigrant community. By doing so, relationships within the Church can be leveraged to encourage psychoeducation and help-seeking, reduce stigma, and build strong social supports within the Korean-Canadian community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".