Strathcona Sauna Collective : wetland stewardship and communal reverence: a site of spiritual and environmental healing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In today’s tumultuous global geopolitics and peak colonial capitalism, amongst the mental health pandemic, COVID-19 and global environmental degradation, one might see bathing as a luxury of escapism. However, a model of collective ownership that nurtures nodes of civic space for communal reverence could radically shift this politic of bodily pleasure. Saunas in Vancouver are either folded into recreational community centres, financially accessible, yet disconnected from the landscape or nestled in some sanctuary with a higher price point and much navel-gazing. This project uses the Holistic Model for a Balanced Life, which includes body, mind, spirit, environment and community, as a framework for designing a sauna that is well integrated into the wetland habitat area of Strathcona Park. Expanding on the community’s culture of land stewardship and resilience, this project highlights the importance of stewardship as acts of care. Whether in maintaining a building, tending to a fire, or planting wetland-appropriate indigenous food species these labours are part of stewardship and the pleasure of this project. Along with the collectively owned sauna and cold plunge pool, this project proposes expanding the wetland habitat area with better integration into the rest of the park including amenities such as public toilets and showers. Through a more thoughtful integration with the community and the natural environment, along with material design considerations, this saunas is a civic node of holistic healing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".