Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dataset containing 38192 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "BasisOfRecord is one of (Observation, Human Observation, Material sample, Specimen, Living Specimen, Occurrence evidence)", "Continent is North America", "Country is Canada", "DatasetKey is one of (EOD – eBird Observation Dataset, iNaturalist Research-grade Observations, University of British Columbia Herbarium (UBC) - Algae Collection, Observation.org, Nature data from around the World, University of Washington, Friday Harbor Labs, Algae, Royal BC Museum - Herbarium (V), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Herbarium; Max & Fran Hommersand Algae Herbarium: Algae, Lyman Entomological Museum (LEMQ), Canadian Museum of Nature Fish Collection, NuSEDS - New Salmon Escapement Database System)", "Geometry POLYGON((-123.97269 48.39422,-123.98048 48.41552,-124.00852 48.44033,-124.04995 48.44714,-124.08203 48.4426,-124.08919 48.43103,-124.08577 48.42358,-123.97923 48.38926,-123.97269 48.39422))", "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "IucnRedListCategory is one of (EN, VU, NT, LC, DD)", "OccurrenceStatus is Present" ] } The dataset includes 38192 records from 5 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0010303-240216155721649/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.262 | 0.366 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".