(Table 2) Production parameters of phytoplankton and some associated parameters in the area of the Titanic Polygon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies were carried out mostly in the area of RMS Titanic wreck site (41°44'N, 49°57'W) located above the continental slope and the south of the Grand Banks of Newfoundland. In a period from 18.06 to 24.09.2001 five surveys of production characteristics of surface phytoplankton were conducted over 5-9 days. Mean values of these characteristics obtained during the surveys were 9.2-11.7 mg C/m**3 per day for primary production (C_phs), 0.102-0.188 mg/m**3 for chlorophyll a (C_chls), and 4.44-7.42 mg C/mg chl. a per hour for assimilation number (AN). The main reason for low C_phs variability was a significant inverse relationship (R=-0.66) between AN and C_chls found over the research area. When cold shelf waters dominated in the area (27.07 to 19.08.2001), C_chls values for the slope region (0.125+/-0.031 µg/l) and for the outer shelf (0.130+/-0.040 µg/l) were similar. During strengthening of influence of warmer slope waters within area (from 29.08 to 13.09.2001), C_chls concentration within surface waters of the outer shelf was 0.152+/-0.039 µg/l and exceeded one for the slope region (0.094+/-0.004 µg/l) by factor 1.6. Against the background of low Cchls values, the High values of integral primary production in the water column (510-1010 mg C/m**2 per day) at low C_chls values measured within the area were determined both by high assimilation activity of phytoplankton and by the deep (30-40 m) maximum of primary production. Main reasons for formation of such a maximum were high chlorophyll concentration within the layer of the deep chlorophyll maximum (up to 0.5-2.5 µg/l) and in the relatively high solar irradiance within this layer varying from 1.4 to 8.6% of subsurface PAR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".