MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906227694 · doi:10.17026/ar/zvexss

Blokdijk 1 te Moerdijk

2025· dataset· nl· W6906227694 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDANS Data Station Archaeology · 2025
Typedataset
Languagenl
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulpitQuarter (Canadian coin)Coronation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De aanleiding voor het onderzoek is de voorgenomen bouw van huisvesting voor arbeidsmigranten. Hiervoor moet een omgevingsvergunning worden aangevraagd voor het afwijken van het bestemmingsplan. Op basis van het bureauonderzoek is een gespecificeerde verwachting opgesteld. Vanaf 6,2 m – NAP (ca 5,7 m -mv) bestaat de ondergrond van het plangebied uit dekzand (Laagpakket van Wierden van de Formatie van Boxtel). Op dit niveau kan in de periode Laat-Paleolithicum tot en met Mesolithicum bewoning hebben plaatsgevonden. De aard van het onderliggende reliëf is in onvoldoende mate bekend om een uitspraak te kunnen doen over de archeologische verwachting voor dit niveau. Een vindplaats zal zich manifesteren als een vondststrooiing, waardoor de kans op het aantreffen daarvan klein is.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.177

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDANS Data Station ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207