MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906434256 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/erm9c

The efficacy and safety of Xianling Gubao Capsules in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

2021· article· en· W6906434256 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapsuleOsteoarthritisAdverse effectClinical efficacyQuality of life (healthcare)Clinical trialRandomized controlled trialArticular capsule of the knee joint

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background:Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic degenerative joint disease, which is the most common type of osteoarthritis. The clinical manifestations are pain, swelling and dysfunction of the knee joint, which seriously reduces the quality of life of patients and causes a huge social burden. At present, western medicine mainly focuses on symptomatic treatment, such as anti-inflammatory and pain relief, joint cavity injection, joint replacement, etc. The curative effect has certain limitations. Xianling Gubao Capsule has some advantages in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, but it lacks high-quality clinical research to verify it. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xianling Gubao Capsule in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Methods:A randomized, double-blind, double-simulation, parallel controlled trial design was used to study the efficacy and safety of Xianling Gubao Capsules in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The patients were randomly divided into a treatment group and the control group according to 1:1. The treatment group: Xianling Gubao capsule + Glucosamine Hydrochloride capsule simulation agent treatment; the control group: Glucosamine Hydrochloride Capsule + Xianling Gubao capsule simulation agent treatment. Both groups received standard treatment for 8 weeks and followed up for 30 days. And at the same time, pay attention to its efficacy and safety indicators. Observation indicators include: the western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), Hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS), liver and kidney function, adverse reactions, etc. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software. Discussion:This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xianling Gubao Capsule in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The results of this experiment will provide evidence support for Xianling Gubao Capsule in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it