MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906434256 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/erm9c

The efficacy and safety of Xianling Gubao Capsules in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

2021· article· en· W6906434256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapsuleOsteoarthritisAdverse effectClinical efficacyQuality of life (healthcare)Clinical trialRandomized controlled trialArticular capsule of the knee joint

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background:Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic degenerative joint disease, which is the most common type of osteoarthritis. The clinical manifestations are pain, swelling and dysfunction of the knee joint, which seriously reduces the quality of life of patients and causes a huge social burden. At present, western medicine mainly focuses on symptomatic treatment, such as anti-inflammatory and pain relief, joint cavity injection, joint replacement, etc. The curative effect has certain limitations. Xianling Gubao Capsule has some advantages in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, but it lacks high-quality clinical research to verify it. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xianling Gubao Capsule in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Methods:A randomized, double-blind, double-simulation, parallel controlled trial design was used to study the efficacy and safety of Xianling Gubao Capsules in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The patients were randomly divided into a treatment group and the control group according to 1:1. The treatment group: Xianling Gubao capsule + Glucosamine Hydrochloride capsule simulation agent treatment; the control group: Glucosamine Hydrochloride Capsule + Xianling Gubao capsule simulation agent treatment. Both groups received standard treatment for 8 weeks and followed up for 30 days. And at the same time, pay attention to its efficacy and safety indicators. Observation indicators include: the western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), Hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS), liver and kidney function, adverse reactions, etc. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software. Discussion:This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xianling Gubao Capsule in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The results of this experiment will provide evidence support for Xianling Gubao Capsule in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207